Start receiving our RegBrief straight to your inbox!


Subscribe

Back
Article

Co-Sourced Solutions: Strengthening Resilience Across Insurance Control Functions

Alana Mackle
Senior Consultant - Member of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries UK

Alana Mackle is a Senior Consultant with over five years of international experience across (re)insurance and consulting. Her expertise spans pricing, reserving, and actuarial modelling, supported by a strong ability to translate complex technical findings into clear, decision-ready insights for senior stakeholders. She has extensive experience delivering Solvency II and IFRS 17 work, with proven capability in model development, validation, and regulatory reporting.

Insurance and financial services are evolving faster than many internal teams can keep up with. Despite frequent talk of resilience, many functions remain one resignation, one review cycle, or one regulatory letter away from a serious capability gap. Solvency II and IFRS 17 continue to challenge insurers, model risk expectations are rising, climate-related work is accelerating, and regulators are demanding deeper challenge and stronger governance.

The Individual Accountability Framework (IAF) and Senior Executive Accountability Framework (SEAR) add further pressure by placing accountability on senior leaders and requiring credible contingency plans for key-person risk. Picture the scenario: a senior actuary resigns weeks before year-end with a six-month hiring lead time, or a full-time risk manager is recruited at great expense to remediate regulatory issues only to become underutilised once the project is complete.

Most in-house teams lack the capacity or technical depth to meet the demands of today’s environment - and regulators know it. Co-sourcing is no longer a “nice to have”;  it has become the go-to operating model for preserving ownership and governance while adding targeted expertise and scalable capacity where it matters most.

Co-Sourcing Is Not Outsourcing. It’s Resilience Engineering.

Let’s be clear: co-sourcing isn’t about offloading work. It’s the opposite. It’s about reinforcing the control framework while keeping:

  • Authority inside the company
  • Accountability where regulators expect it
  • Knowledge embedded in the business

Traditional outsourcing can create distance, loss of context, and regulatory risk. Co-sourcing overcomes this by embedding expertise, providing on-demand technical depth, and delivering independent challenge - meeting Solvency II expectations. Regulators don’t want outsourced functions; they want well-resourced ones. Co-sourcing bridges that gap.

Why the Shift Is Accelerating Now

1. Rising Regulatory Scrutiny and Less Tolerance for Under-Resourcing

Inspections, thematic reviews, and supervisory letters are hammering the same themes:

  • Weak model governance
  • Shallow validation
  • Insufficient challenge
  • Overstretched actuarial, risk, and compliance teams

Co-sourcing helps insurers demonstrate what supervisors want to see: credible resourcing, independent challenge, and sustainable delivery - not heroics from the same two people every quarter-end.

2. A Structural Talent Challenge

Across the core control functions, particularly actuarial and risk teams, insurers face a structural talent challenge that the market isn’t resolving.

Recruitment cycles are long, specialist skills are increasingly niche, and retention rates are declining. Workforce expectations have also shifted: hybrid working is now mandatory for many, experienced specialists prefer portfolio careers, and younger professionals prioritise flexibility and balance over traditional corporate roles.

Co-sourcing fills this gap by providing scalable, on-demand expertise - including specialists who would be impractical or too costly to hire permanently - multiplying internal capability without adding permanent headcount.

Co-Sourcing vs Outsourcing: Why the Distinction Matters

Full outsourcing - common in actuarial and internal audit - can create over reliance on external providers. The excessive dependency can leave firm’s unable to run a competitive tender process when fees inevitably rise. Co-sourcing avoids this by keeping the power balance in check.

A co-sourced model ensures:

  • Internal ownership of key judgements
  • Alignment with regulatory expectations on oversight and independence
  • Retention of critical business knowledge
  • Access to technical depth as needed

The result is a more resilient, transparent, and sustainable operating model.

Where Co-sourcing Delivers Value

The Solvency II control functions continue to see strong uptake of hybrid delivery models:

  1. Actuarial – Assumption benchmarking, independent review and talent mentoring
  2. Risk Management – Strengthening the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA), scenario design, and emerging-risk assessment
  3. Compliance – Robust regulatory horizon scanning, increased bandwidth for regulatory interactions, and benchmarking against industry practice
  4. Internal Audit – Provision of independent subject matter expertise to support the third line for specialised audit topics.

Across these functions, co-sourcing provides independent challenge, specialist capability, and insight into evolving market practice.

Avoiding Common Challenges

Co-sourcing delivers value when implemented correctly - but it is not a silver bullet. Issues arise when roles are unclear, knowledge becomes concentrated with external teams, documentation fragments, or independence requirements are misunderstood, particularly in risk and internal audit. The most common pitfall is internal oversight slipping due to overreliance and overfamiliarity with co-sourced providers who are assumed to handle everything.

These issues are preventable. Clear governance, defined ownership, and structured knowledge documentation ensure that co-sourcing strengthens internal capability. Success requires active management, with accountability and oversight firmly retained within the organisation.

What Good Co-Sourcing Looks Like

 

Strong co-sourcing models maintain internal accountability, embed external expertise where it adds most value, ensure transparent governance, document decision paths, and scale capacity with business cycles. Smooth integration with existing controls ensures continuity even when existing control frameworks, ensuring continuity even when key personnel leave.

Beyond the compliance assurance, co-sourced solutions can provide flexibility to manage workload, reduce reliance on permanent headcount, and give access to specialist skills that would be costly or impossible to hire full-time. Cost efficiency follows naturally, but the primary goal remains strengthening internal capability and operational resilience.

Looking Ahead

Rising regulatory, risk, and reporting expectations require operating models that deliver resilience without compromising oversight. Co-sourcing reinforces internal teams with specialist expertise, independent challenge, and market insight, providing a sustainable, well-governed, and cost-effective way to maintain technical depth and operational continuity.

How Finalyse Bridges Insurers’ Resourcing Gap

Finalyse helps insurers translate this hybrid approach into practical solutions. Examples include:

  • Scaling actuarial teams during year-end and Solvency II reporting cycles
  • Providing specialist risk and model validation expertise at short notice
  • Supplementing internal audit functions with independent actuarial expertise for bespoke audit deep-dives
  • Assisting compliance teams during regulatory remediation projects without adding permanent headcount

By embedding expertise, maintaining internal ownership, and offering flexible, scalable capacity, Finalyse enables insurers to meet regulatory expectations, manage market and operational shocks, and strengthen the resilience of their control functions.

Learn more

AI Summary Prompt: The European Commission’s July 2025 amendments to the Solvency II Delegated Acts, effective 29 January 2027, align with the 2024 Directive reforms to enhance proportionality, stability, and long-term investment incentives. Key changes include a reduced Cost of Capital (4.75%), new risk tapering, revised yield curve smoothing, and updated volatility and matching adjustments. Additional refinements cover contract boundaries, expense assumptions, and climate risk treatment, improving consistency with IFRS 17. Updates to Own Funds tighten rules on dividends, participations, and ring-fenced funds. These updates modernize the EU insurance prudential framework and require early readiness assessments by insurers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Co-sourcing reinforces internal control functions by embedding expert support while keeping authority, accountability, and knowledge inside the organization. Unlike outsourcing - which can create distance, dependency, and regulatory risk - co-sourcing maintains internal ownership and governance while adding targeted, on-demand expertise.

Actuarial, Risk Management, Compliance, and Internal Audit functions see the strongest impact. Co-sourcing enhances areas such as ORSA, model validation, assumption reviews, scenario design, regulatory horizon scanning, and specialist audit topics.

Co-sourcing provides scalable capacity, specialist skills, and independent challenge without adding permanent headcount. It ensures continuity during staff turnover, addresses capability gaps, and enhances credibility with regulators - resulting in a more resilient, well-governed operating model.

Share this article:

Finalyse Insurance

Finalyse offers specialized consulting for insurance and pension sectors, focusing on risk management, actuarial modeling, and regulatory compliance. Their services include Solvency II support, IFRS 17 implementation, and climate risk assessments, ensuring robust frameworks and regulatory alignment for institutions.

Finalyse Banking

Finalyse leverages 35+ years of banking expertise to guide you through regulatory challenges with tailored risk solutions.
Our multidisciplinary team masters both technical and regulatory aspects, helping you adopt best practices and boost performance.

Finalyse Valuation

Valuing complex products is both costly and demanding, requiring quality data, advanced models, and expert support. Finalyse Valuation Services are tailored to client needs, ensuring transparency and ongoing collaboration. Our experts analyse and reconcile counterparty prices to explain and document any differences.

Finalyse Publications

Discover Finalyse writings, written for you by our experienced consultants, read whitepapers, our RegBrief and blog articles to stay ahead of the trends in the Banking, Insurance and Managed Services world

About Finalyse

Our aim is to support our clients incorporating changes and innovations in valuation, risk and compliance. We share the ambition to contribute to a sustainable and resilient financial system. Facing these extraordinary challenges is what drives us every day.

Finalyse Careers

Unlock your potential with Finalyse: as risk management pioneers with over 35 years of experience, we provide advisory services and empower clients in making informed decisions. Our mission is to support them in adapting to changes and innovations, contributing to a sustainable and resilient financial system.